Cognitive synergy in groups and group-to-individual transfer of decision-making competencies
نویسندگان
چکیده
In a field study (148 participants organized in 38 groups) we tested the effect of group synergy and one's position in relation to the collaborative zone of proximal development (CZPD) on the change of individual decision-making competencies. We used two parallel sets of decision tasks reported in previous research to test rationality and we evaluated individual decision-making competencies in the pre-group and post-group conditions as well as group rationality (as an emergent group level phenomenon). We used multilevel modeling to analyze the data and the results showed that members of synergetic groups had a higher cognitive gain as compared to members of non-synergetic groups, while highly rational members (members above the CZPD) had lower cognitive gains compared to less rational group members (members situated below the CZPD). These insights extend the literature on group-to-individual transfer of learning and have important practical implications as they show that group dynamics influence the development of individual decision-making competencies.
منابع مشابه
Decision Rules and Group Rationality: Cognitive Gain or Standstill?
Recent research in group cognition points towards the existence of collective cognitive competencies that transcend individual group members' cognitive competencies. Since rationality is a key cognitive competence for group decision making, and group cognition emerges from the coordination of individual cognition during social interactions, this study tests the extent to which collaborative and...
متن کاملWhen None of Us Perform Better than All of Us Together: The Role of Analogical Decision Rules in Groups
During social interactions, groups develop collective competencies that (ideally) should assist groups to outperform average standalone individual members (weak cognitive synergy) or the best performing member in the group (strong cognitive synergy). In two experimental studies we manipulate the type of decision rule used in group decision-making (identify the best vs. collaborative), and the w...
متن کاملEffect of Individual Counseling on the Participation Rate of Pregnant Mothers in Decision Making on the Treatment Process: Clinical Trial
Aim: Due to the high Sensitivity of pregnancy and the vulnerability of mothers during this period, their participation in clinical decisions is very important. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of individual counseling on the participation of pregnant women in decision making on the treatment process. Methods & Materials: This clinical trial study was carried out on 190 pre...
متن کاملمدلی برای بهبود بهرهوری تصمیمگیری گروهی
Dynamic organization management, solving complex and unstructured organizational problems, and management of ever-increasing changes and dynamisms in organizational environments requires knowledge, capacity and skill of a group of managers and experts who are to make timely, appropriate and quality decisions for the organizational excellence and competitive advantage. Group decision making is ...
متن کاملAssessment of Prospective Memory, Risky Decision-Making, Collaborative Decision-Making among Individuals with Morning and Evening Circadian Typology
Introduction: Biological aspects of personality have an influence on people psychological dimensions. The present study was aimed to compare prospective memory, risky decision-making, collaborative decision-making between individuals with morning and evening circadian typology. Methods: For this purpose, a study with quantitative methodology approach and a descriptive design was conceived. T...
متن کامل